Tractor comparison is very important before buying tractor. It provides us detailed information regarding competitor tractors so that we can evaluate and compare both tractor and pick best of them. Here we are comparing Eicher 557 Tractor with Farmtrac 6055 Tractor. In this page you will find Price, Mileage, Features, Specifications, warranty and many other details of both the tractors and easily choose one of the best tractors from both models.
Price Comparison: Eicher 557 vs Farmtrac 6055
Below is Price Comparison between Eicher 557 and Farmtrac 6055. Here is Latest price comparison of both tractors. Eicher 557 Tractor price starts from Rs. 7.95 lakhs and Farmtrac 6055 tractor price starts from Rs. 8.50 lakhs. Eicher tractor model is cheaper than the Farmtrac tractor model.
| Eicher 557 | Farmtrac 6055 |
| Rs. 7.95 Lakh | Rs. 8.50 Lakh |
Check Other Comparison:
- Eicher 557 vs Swaraj 855
- Eicher 557 vs Eicher 551
- Eicher 557 vs Sonalika 750
- Eicher 557 vs Farmtrac 60
- Eicher 557 vs Swaraj 960
- Eicher 557 vs Arjun 605
- Eicher 557 vs Swaraj 744
- Eicher 557 vs Sonalika 60
Check Other tractors price:
- All Eicher tractors
- All Swaraj tractors
- All Sonalika tractors
- All Farmtrac tractors
- All Mahindra tractors
Specification Comparison: Eicher 557 vs Farmtrac 6055
In this page, Compare HP of Tractors, PTO Power, How much Mileage that tractor is giving and its comparison, Fuel Tank capacity of both Tractors, Hydraulics capacity to lift the heavy weight etc. Compare between Eicher 557 vs Farmtrac 6055. With this comparison of tractor you can choose best tractor from these two tractor models.
| Engine | Eicher 557 | FARMTRAC 6055 |
| No. Of Cylinder | 3 | 4 |
| HP Category | 55 HP | 55 HP |
| Capacity CC | 3300 CC | 3680 CC |
| Engine Rated RPM | 2150 | 1850 |
| Cooling | WATER COOLED | Water Cooled |
| Air Filter | OIL BATH TYPE | Oil Bath Type |
| Transmission | Eicher 557 | FARMTRAC 6055 |
| Transmission Type | NA | Side Shift / Center Shift |
| Clutch | DRY TYPE SINGLE / DUAL (OPTIONAL) | Dual Clutch |
| Alternator | 12 V 36 A | 40 Amp |
| Battery | 12 V 75 AH | 12 V |
| Gear Box | 8 FORWARD + 2 REVERSE | 16 + 4 (T20) Constant Mesh / 8+2 Constant Mesh |
| Forward Speed | 32.31 | 2.6-30.5 Kmph (Standard Mode) 2.2-26.4 Kmph (T20 Mode) |
| Reverse speed | NA | 2.8-10.5 Kmph (Standard Mode) 2.4-9.1 Kmph (T20 Mode) |
| Brakes | Eicher 557 | FARMTRAC 6055 |
| Brake | DRY DISC BREAKS / OIL IMMERSED BREAKS (OPTIONAL) | Multi Plate Oil Immersed Disc Brake |
| Hydraulics | Eicher 557 | FARMTRAC 6055 |
| Lifting Capacity | 2000 | 1800 Kg |
| 3 point Linkage | DRAFT , POSITON AND RESPONSE CONTROL LINKS | ADDC |
| Steering | Eicher 557 | FARMTRAC 6055 |
| Type | MANUAL / POWER STEERING (OPTIONAL) | Balanced Power Steering / Mechanical |
| Steering Column | NA | Single Drop Arm |
| Power | Eicher 557 | FARMTRAC 6055 |
| Type | LIVE PTO / MSPTO (OPTIONAL) | 540 Multi Speed Reverse PTO |
| RPM | 540 | 1810 |
| Tyres | Eicher 557 | FARMTRAC 6055 |
| Wheel Drive | 2 | 4 |
| Front | 7.50X16 | 7.50 X 16 |
| Rear | 14.9X28 / 16.9X28 (OPTIONAL) | 16.9 X 28 |
| Fuel Tank | Eicher 557 | FARMTRAC 6055 |
| Capacity | 45 Lit | 60 Lit |
| Dimensions | Eicher 557 | FARMTRAC 6055 |
| Total Weight | 2200 Kg | 2410 (Unballasted Kg |
| Wheel Base | 1980 Mm | 2255 Mm |
| Overall Length | 3660 Mm | 3600 Mm |
| Overall Width | 1780 Mm | 1890 Mm |
| Ground Clearance | 380 Mm | 430 Mm |
| Turning Radius With Brakes | 3750 Mm | 3250 Mm |
| Accessories | Eicher 557 | FARMTRAC 6055 |
| Accessories | TOOLS , BUMPHER , TOP LINK | TOOL, TOPLINK, CANOPY, HOOK, BUMPHER, DRAWBAR |
| Options | Eicher 557 | FARMTRAC 6055 |
| Options | NA | NA |
| Features | Eicher 557 | FARMTRAC 6055 |
| Features | High Torque Backup , High Fuel Efficiency | NA |
| Warranty | Eicher 557 | FARMTRAC 6055 |
| Warranty | 2 Yr | 2000 Hour Or 2 Yr |
| Status | Eicher 557 | FARMTRAC 6055 |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
Above is the Full comparison between Eicher 557 vs Farmtrac 6055 tractor. We include Price, Mileage, HP, Power, Fuel Tank, Hydraulics etc details in this comparison. Comment below for more comparisons.